Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M31 has a general score of 86.5, which is better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite's 74.1 global score. Despite being the best in our current comparison, Galaxy M31 is an older, just a bit heavier and thicker cellphone than OPPO Find X3 Lite. Both phones in our current comparison have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should provide the user identical OS features.
OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy M31, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has more RAM. OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M31, and although they both have a display with the same size, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a just a bit better display pixels density, a lot brighter display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy M31 has a greater storage capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M31 features a superior battery lifetime than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy M31 captures slightly better pictures and videos than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures or videos in low-light environments, they both have the same video resolution, a 64 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and the same video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.