Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M31s has a general score of 88, which is much better than OPPO Find X3 Lite's overall score of 74.1. The Galaxy M31s body is somewhat heavier and thicker than the OPPO Find X3 Lite. These devices come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy M31s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM.
OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy M31s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a quite better pixel density. Galaxy M31s counts with a superior storage for applications and games than OPPO Find X3 Lite, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy M31s also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy M31s takes slightly better photographs and videos than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and video, they both have the same video frame rates, a camera in the back with a 64 megapixels resolution and the same video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy M31s counts with a much better battery life than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.