Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
32 GBSM-N9005
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 365.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.16 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a general score of 79.5, which is a bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite's 74.1 score. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a incredibly older and just a little bit thicker device than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, but Samsung managed to build it a little lighter anyway. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has an older 5.0 version while OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11 version.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a bit sharper display than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the display, a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a bit smaller display. OPPO Find X3 Lite features a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a bit better processor than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and they are faster). The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with greater battery life than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 34 percent bigger battery size.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a lot larger diafragm aperture and a way better resolution back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.