Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 has a score of 87.1, which is much better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite's score of 74.1. Even being the best device in our current comparison, the Galaxy Note9 body is notably older, somewhat thicker and heavier than the OPPO Find X3 Lite. The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note9, although it has a quite worse pixel amount in each display inch and a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, they both have a same size screen.
The Galaxy Note9 has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Lite, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note9 also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy Note9 counts with just a bit better performance than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite has just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy Note9, because it has an 8 percent more battery size. OPPO Find X3 Lite features a better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.