Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black, Gold and Gray |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is slightly better than OPPO Find X3 Lite, with a general score of 79.3 against 74.1. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is older than OPPO Find X3 Lite, it's body is thinner and lighter. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has 5.1 version while OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11 version.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a better performing CPU than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a greater number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a little more vivid display than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel number per display inch and a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
OPPO Find X3 Lite has a very superior storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The OPPO Find X3 Lite features a superior camera than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a bigger diafragm aperture and a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is also by far the cheapest, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.