Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is much better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, having an 85.5 score against 74.1. Xiaomi Pocophone F1's design is extremely older, thicker and just a little bit heavier than OPPO Find X3 Lite. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bit better performance than OPPO Find X3 Lite. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite has just a bit better screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a just a little more pixels per inch of screen, more display brightness and a bit larger display. OPPO Find X3 Lite features a superior camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a larger camera aperture to capture better photography and video in low light situations.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much better storage capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has 128 GB more internal memory and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB. The OPPO Find X3 Lite has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.