Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Galactic Silver and Starlight Black | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 975.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has an overall score of 91.8, which is much better than OPPO Find X3 Neo's 76 score. Both phones in this comparison use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both of them should provide very similar OS features. Despite being the best in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's body is older, just a bit thicker and a little bit heavier than the OPPO Find X3 Neo.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo has a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a higher amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also counts with a just a bit better pixels number in each display inch.
The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a better memory to install games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G's battery life is just as good as the OPPO Find X3 Neo one.
Galaxy A71 5G has a bit better camera than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.