Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Galactic Silver and Starlight Black | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 975.00 | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 is better than OPPO Find X3 Neo, getting an 87.1 score against 76. Even being the best device we compare here, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 body is noticeably older, a little bit heavier and thicker than OPPO Find X3 Neo. OPPO Find X3 Neo has a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note9, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Find X3 Neo has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of display and a lot worse 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen. The OPPO Find X3 Neo takes better photos and videos than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also counts with a camera with a lot better resolution.
Galaxy Note9 counts with a slightly better memory capacity for applications and games than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB. The OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with just a little better battery duration than Galaxy Note9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Galaxy Note9 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.