Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Galactic Silver and Starlight Black | Black, Gold and Gray |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 975.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 edge+ is slightly better than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, having a 79.3 score against 76. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S6 edge+ has the older 5.1 version while OPPO Find X3 Neo has Android 11 version. Although Galaxy S6 edge+ is notably older than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, it's construction is somewhat thinner and lighter.
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a bit better screen than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a higher pixels quantity per inch in the screen. The OPPO Find X3 Neo has a faster processing unit than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores (and faster).
OPPO Find X3 Neo has a better camera than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a lot more MP back facing camera, a bigger camera aperture to take better images in poorly lited environments and higher 60 fps video frame rates. OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a superior memory for applications and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has more internal memory capacity.
OPPO Find X3 Neo has a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 50% greater battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Galaxy S6 edge+ is also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.