Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-30 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 526 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 Plus is slightly better than OPPO Find X3 Pro, getting a global score of 87.1 against 79.9. Even though iPhone 8 Plus is incredibly older and just a little heavier than OPPO Find X3 Pro, it's design is still just a little thinner. IPhone 8 Plus features a bit superior processor than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has a lower number of cores and also slower and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has just a bit better looking display than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a lot higher 1440 x 3216 resolution, a better display density and a bigger screen. The Apple iPhone 8 Plus's storage capacity for applications and games is very similar to OPPO Find X3 Pro's one, they have the same internal memory capacity.
OPPO Find X3 Pro captures better videos and photos than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a much more mega pixels camera and a much bigger sensor. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2691mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.