Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-30 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL has a general score of 82.5, which is slightly better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro's 79.9 score. Google Pixel 2 XL's design is a bit lighter and just a little thinner than OPPO Find X3 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit faster processor than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM.
OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit better screen than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1440 x 3216px resolution and a bit bigger screen. The OPPO Find X3 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a lot larger sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality, a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and higher video frame rates.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory. OPPO Find X3 Pro features improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.