Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-30 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is slightly better than OPPO Find X3 Pro, with an 81.9 score against 79.9. Google Pixel 4's construction is a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, although it was released just a bit further than a year before. OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with just a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 4, because it has a little higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3216 and a bigger screen. OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro takes a lot better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for capturing photos and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a camera with a lot higher 50 mega pixels resolution, faster video frame rates and a way larger back-facing camera sensor.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 61% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.