Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-30 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, with a score of 82.9 against 79.9. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS, so they should offer all the same OS features. Google Pixel 4a is a a lot lighter and a little bit thinner phone than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, although they were released only 7 months apart.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a bigger display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3216 and a just a little higher pixel amount per inch of screen. OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit faster processing unit than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
OPPO Find X3 Pro has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with higher 60 fps video frame rates, a way larger camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a much more mega pixels back facing camera.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3140mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.