Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-30 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is much better than OPPO Find X3 Pro, with an 89 score against 79.9. The Google Pixel 5 is a a lot lighter and just a bit thinner device than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, even when both of them were only released with a couple months difference. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 5, because it has a bit bigger screen, a better 1440 x 3216 pixels resolution and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit better processor than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X3 Pro features a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 5, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
OPPO Find X3 Pro features a much better camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for shooting photos and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a back camera with a way higher 50 megapixels resolution and a much bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a little longer battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.