Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-03-30 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 526 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X3 Pro is slightly better than the HTC One M9, having a 79.9 score against 77.7. These devices work with Android operating system, but OPPO Find X3 Pro has a newer 11 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0. OPPO Find X3 Pro's body is a lot newer and thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the HTC One M9.
The HTC One M9 counts with just a bit better screen than OPPO Find X3 Pro, although it has a way smaller screen, a little less pixels per inch of display and a way worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution. HTC One M9 counts with just a little better hardware performance than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has 9 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the HTC One M9 also counts with a graphics co-processor and a 64 bits processor.
OPPO Find X3 Pro features a lot bigger storage for games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. OPPO Find X3 Pro features a superior camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a larger aperture to capture better captures in low-light situations, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photos, better video frame rates and a way more mega pixels back camera.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a much better battery life than HTC One M9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.