Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-30 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 526 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X3 Pro has a global score of 79.9, which is a bit better than the HTC U11's global score of 77.6. OPPO Find X3 Pro is a a lot newer device than HTC U11, but it is a little thicker and heavier. OPPO Find X3 Pro has a bit better looking screen than HTC U11, because although it has a just a bit lower display density, it also counts with a little higher 1440 x 3216 resolution and a larger display.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit better processor than HTC U11, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a superior memory to store more games and applications than HTC U11, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a much better battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a much better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with higher video frame rate, a much bigger sensor providing a much better image quality and a camera with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.