Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-30 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8 ThinQ has an overall score of 84.3, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro's global score of 79.9. The LG G8 ThinQ body has the same thickness than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, but it is lighter. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but LG G8 ThinQ has a newer 9.0 Pie version and OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11 version.
LG G8 ThinQ counts with a bit better looking display than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower 1440 x 3120px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel density. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit more powerful processing unit than LG G8 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has more RAM.
The LG G8 ThinQ features a much better storage for apps and games than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The OPPO Find X3 Pro has superior battery lifetime than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro captures much better photos and videos than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and video, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a way more mega pixels camera and a way larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.