Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-03-30 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is a bit better than OPPO Find X3 Pro, with an 82.5 score against 79.9. LG V30S ThinQ's construction is somewhat lighter and thinner than OPPO Find X3 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. These phones have Android OS, but LG V30S ThinQ has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11 version, providing a couple nice extra features and optimized performance.
OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a little sharper screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a quite larger display and a quite better 1440 x 3216px resolution. OPPO Find X3 Pro has a bit better performance than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has more RAM.
LG V30S ThinQ features a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The OPPO Find X3 Pro has improved battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
OPPO Find X3 Pro captures much clearer photographs and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, higher video frame rates and a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.