Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-30 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is a bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro's 79.9 general score. Although LG V35 ThinQ is older than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, it's body is somewhat lighter and thinner. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a display that is just as good as the screen in OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although the LG V35 ThinQ has a bit worse resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher screen pixels density.
OPPO Find X3 Pro has a bit faster processing unit than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. OPPO Find X3 Pro takes much clearer photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rates, a lot bigger sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality and a back camera with a much higher resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. OPPO Find X3 Pro features improved battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.