Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-30 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is slightly better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, with an 81.2 score against 79.9. These devices include Android operating system, but the LG V40 ThinQ has older 10 version while OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11 version. Even though LG V40 ThinQ is noticeably older than OPPO Find X3 Pro, it's design is somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner.
LG V40 ThinQ has a screen that's just as good as the OPPO Find X3 Pro one, because although the LG V40 ThinQ has a quite smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1440 x 3120, it also counts with a little bit better pixel amount in each inch of screen. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bigger storage to store more apps and games than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit better CPU than LG V40 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for capturing photos and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution and a way bigger back camera sensor.
OPPO Find X3 Pro features longer battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.