Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-30 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is slightly better than OPPO Find X3 Pro, having a general score of 87.1 against 79.9. LG Velvet is an older phone than OPPO Find X3 Pro, but LG was able to build it just a little thinner and just a little bit lighter. The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a bit sharper screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher 1440 x 3216 pixels resolution.
OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit better performance than LG Velvet, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has more RAM memory. The LG Velvet features a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a bit superior battery lifetime than LG Velvet, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a slightly better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a back facing camera with more mega-pixels, a much larger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.