Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-03-30 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is slightly better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro's overall score of 79.9. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a a lot newer device than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, although it's a little thicker and a bit heavier. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more recent 14 version while OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11, so it provides you a couple nice extra features and enhanced performance.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a little more vivid display than OPPO Find X3 Pro, although it has a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a much lower pixels density, they both have a display of the same size. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because it has more internal storage.
OPPO Find X3 Pro has a much better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra. Both of them have a 12 GB RAM and 8 processing cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra and OPPO Find X3 Pro count with incredibly similar batteries. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes a little bit better videos and photos than OPPO Find X3 Pro, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and a same resolution camera in the back, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger aperture to capture better low light photos and videos and a larger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.