Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-30 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LTPS |
| 526 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G is a bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, with an 81.5 score against 79.9. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Moto G 5G has the previous 10 version and OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11 version. Despite being the best in our current comparison, the Moto G 5G design is a bit heavier and somewhat thicker than OPPO Find X3 Pro.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features just a bit better looking display than Moto G 5G, and although they both have a display of the same size, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3216 and a higher pixel quantity per inch of display. OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit bigger storage for applications and games than Moto G 5G, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory.
OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has more RAM. OPPO Find X3 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Moto G 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting images in low light environments, and they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with a better resolution and better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The Moto G 5G counts with a little longer battery performance than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.