Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-30 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom has a score of 80, which is a bit better than OPPO Find X3 Pro's 79.9 overall score. Motorola One Zoom's design is just a little lighter than OPPO Find X3 Pro, but it is just a little bit thicker and was released just 19 months before. OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a better 1440 x 3216px resolution, a greater pixels density and a little larger display.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with just a bit better performance than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X3 Pro features just a bit better camera than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking photos or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality, faster 60 fps video frame rate and a camera in the back with a better 50 megapixels resolution.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has slightly more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with just a little better battery performance than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.