Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Nokia |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-30 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Meteor grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 526 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a score of 80.3, which is a bit better than OPPO Find X3 Pro's global score of 79.9. Despite being the best we compare here, we must highlight that it is also a somewhat heavier and a little thicker device. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has an older 10 version while OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11 version.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a slightly better display than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3216px and a better pixel number per inch of screen. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with just a little better processing power than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW captures a bit better photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has a smaller sensor which gives a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also counts with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution camera.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has just a bit bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X3 Pro and Nokia 8 V 5G UW both feature very similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.