Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-30 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Sonic silver |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X3 Pro is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S, with a general score of 79.9 against 76.2. These phones include Android operating system, but OPPO Find X3 Pro has a more recent 11 version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10, so it offers lots of additional features. Even though the OPPO Find X3 Pro and the nubia Red Magic 5S were only released with a couple months difference, the OPPO Find X3 Pro is somewhat thinner and lighter.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a little bit better hardware performance than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. OPPO Find X3 Pro has just a bit better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have a same size display, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a better 1440 x 3216 pixels resolution and a better pixels count per inch in the display.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Nubia Red Magic 5S's battery performance is just as good as the battery life in OPPO Find X3 Pro. Nubia Red Magic 5S takes a bit better pictures and videos than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera sensor giving a lower image quality, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a camera with a much better 64 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.