Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-30 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is slightly better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, with an 83.8 score against 79.9. Despite of the fact that Galaxy A50 is way older than OPPO Find X3 Pro, it's body is a little thinner and somewhat lighter. The OPPO Find X3 Pro has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A50, because it has a little bigger screen, a greater count of pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 3216 resolution.
Galaxy A50 features slightly more memory capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The OPPO Find X3 Pro captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and video, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor, a much more megapixels camera in the back and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.