Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-30 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a score of 86.6, which is slightly better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro's score of 79.9. Samsung Galaxy A50s's body is somewhat lighter and just a little thinner than OPPO Find X3 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released just 18 months before. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version and OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11 version.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM memory. OPPO Find X3 Pro features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A50s, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3216 pixels, a quite bigger display and a higher pixels count per screen inch.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a back facing camera with a higher resolution, a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures and video and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Galaxy A50s has slightly more storage for games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 13 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.