Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-30 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 has an overall score of 85.5, which is slightly better than OPPO Find X3 Pro's 79.9 score. Samsung Galaxy A51 is an older device than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, but it's somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner anyway. These phones come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding that.
OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a little bit larger screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3216px and a higher pixel amount in each display inch. The Galaxy A51 counts with a little bit better memory to install games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X3 Pro has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a much larger sensor capturing much better quality videos and pictures, better video frame rates, a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited environments and a more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 13% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.