Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-30 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is better than OPPO Find X3 Pro, getting a score of 90.8 against 79.9. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that. The Galaxy A51 5G design is a little lighter than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, although it's just a little bit thicker and was released around 11 months before.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a bit bigger display, a higher screen pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3216. The OPPO Find X3 Pro has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy A51 5G has a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy A51 5G's battery lifetime is just as good as OPPO Find X3 Pro's battery performance.
OPPO Find X3 Pro shoots slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a much larger back camera sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality, faster video frame rate, a bigger aperture and a camera in the back with a higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.