Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-30 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is much better than OPPO Find X3 Pro, having a 90.7 score against 79.9. The Galaxy A52 body has the same thickness than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, but it is a little bit lighter. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3216 pixels, more pixels per screen inch and a bit bigger screen.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy A52, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy A52 has a camera that is just as good as the OPPO Find X3 Pro one, because although the Galaxy A52 has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a same size aperture, it also counts with a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 and OPPO Find X3 Pro feature very similar batteries duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.