Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-03-30 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a global score of 91.3, which is better than OPPO Find X3 Pro's global score of 79.9. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version and OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11 version. Galaxy A52 5G's construction has the same thickness than OPPO Find X3 Pro, but it's a bit lighter.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X3 Pro has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has more pixels per inch of screen, a little larger display and a higher 1440 x 3216 resolution.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro and the Galaxy A52 5G have extremely similar cameras, because although the Galaxy A52 5G has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier camera sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have the same aperture and the same (4K) video quality, it also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a battery life that is very similar to the OPPO Find X3 Pro one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.