Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-30 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X3 Pro is just a bit better than the Galaxy A70, having a 79.9 score against 76.9. OPPO Find X3 Pro's body is newer than Galaxy A70's, but it is just a little bit thicker and a bit heavier. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the OPPO Find X3 Pro has a newer 11 version and Galaxy A70 has Android 10.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have a display with the same size, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3216px and a better screen pixel density. OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A70, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro captures greater pictures and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for taking images or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor and higher video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A70 counts with a battery duration that is very similar to the battery lifetime in OPPO Find X3 Pro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.