Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-30 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 526 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 has a global score of 87.5, which is a little bit better than OPPO Find X3 Pro's 79.9 general score. Galaxy A71's design is a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released around a year before. Both of these phones include the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A71, and although they both have a display with the same size, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a better pixels count in each inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3216. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A71, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM.
Galaxy A71 features a slightly bigger storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A71 has a little bit better camera than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing worse quality videos and photos and worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Galaxy A71 features a battery duration that's just as good as the battery lifetime in OPPO Find X3 Pro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.