Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-30 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Prism bricks black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 526 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, getting a overall score of 92.9 against 79.9. Galaxy A71 5G UW's construction has the same thickness than OPPO Find X3 Pro, but it is a little lighter. These phones have Android OS, but Galaxy A71 5G UW has the previous 10 version while OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11 version.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a better 1440 x 3216 resolution and a greater quantity of pixels per screen inch. OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with more storage for applications and games than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a little bit better camera than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has lower video frame rates and a smaller sensor which provides a lower photo and video quality, and they both have a same size aperture and the same video quality, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW's battery performance is just as good as the OPPO Find X3 Pro one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.