Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-30 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a global score of 85.2, which is just a bit better than OPPO Find X3 Pro's 79.9 overall score. Even though the Galaxy A9 (2018) is much older than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, it's construction is just a little bit thinner and just a little lighter. OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a better pixels quantity in each display inch, a bit larger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3216 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a slightly better memory capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
OPPO Find X3 Pro takes better pictures and videos than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for taking pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution and higher video frame rates.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has an 18% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.