Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-30 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is a lot better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro's global score of 79.9. Both devices we compare here work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11 version, so it offers some additional features and performance improvements. Samsung Galaxy Fold's design is thinner than OPPO Find X3 Pro, but it's a lot heavier and was released about a year before.
OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3216 resolution and a greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen. Galaxy Fold's processor is just as good as the processor in OPPO Find X3 Pro, both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Galaxy Fold features a much bigger memory for games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because it has more internal memory capacity. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a little longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The OPPO Find X3 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a way bigger sensor taking much better quality videos and pictures and a lot better 50 MP resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.