Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-30 | 2019-06-18 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 526 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M40 is slightly better than OPPO Find X3 Pro, having a global score of 85 against 79.9. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy M40 has an older 10 version and OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11. Samsung Galaxy M40 is an older cellphone than OPPO Find X3 Pro, but Samsung managed to make it somewhat lighter and a bit thinner.
OPPO Find X3 Pro has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy M40, because it has a better 1440 x 3216 resolution, a quite bigger screen and a better screen pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy M40 has a bit bigger memory for applications and games than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy M40, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM. OPPO Find X3 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy M40, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low-light images, and they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a much more mega pixels back facing camera and higher video frame rate.
OPPO Find X3 Pro has better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy M40, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.