Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-30 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 526 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is better than OPPO Find X3 Pro, with a general score of 90.8 against 79.9. The Galaxy Note 20 is a a bit heavier cellphone than OPPO Find X3 Pro, but both of them are equally thin. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20's processing unit is just as good as the OPPO Find X3 Pro one, and although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have a display with the same size, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a greater pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3216px. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with much more storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro takes better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a bigger sensor which offers a better photo and video quality, faster 60 frames per second video frame rates and a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 5% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.