Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-30 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, with a 98.9 score against 79.9. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body is just a little heavier but just a little bit thinner than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, and they were only released 7 months apart. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version and OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little bit better processing power than OPPO Find X3 Pro. Both have 12 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processor. OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little better pixel density and a quite better 1440 x 3216 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a superior camera than OPPO Find X3 Pro, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality, a camera in the back with lot more MP and a way better video definition. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a better storage capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a battery life that's very similar to the battery life in OPPO Find X3 Pro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.