Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2021-03-30 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Black, Pink and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has a general score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro's global score of 79.9. Galaxy Note 3 is a somewhat lighter cellphone than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, but they are equally thin. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but Galaxy Note 3 has older 5.0 version and OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11 version.
OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM and a larger number of cores. Galaxy Note 3 has a bit more vivid screen than OPPO Find X3 Pro, although it has a lot worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, a lot lesser pixels per inch in the display and a little smaller display.
OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a way better resolution camera in the back, a larger camera aperture, a lot bigger camera sensor and better video frame rate. OPPO Find X3 Pro has a superior memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.