Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-03-30 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X3 Pro is slightly better than the Galaxy Note 5, having a 79.9 score against 79.3. Both of these phones have Android OS, but OPPO Find X3 Pro has 11 version and Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version, so it gives you a lot of extra features and optimized performance. OPPO Find X3 Pro's construction is much newer, but a bit thicker and heavier than the Galaxy Note 5.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a bit better screen than OPPO Find X3 Pro, although it has a little bit inferior count of pixels per display inch, a little lower resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a little bit smaller screen. The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a faster processing unit than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores (and faster).
OPPO Find X3 Pro has a greater camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a lot more MP back facing camera, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography and video, a way bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photos and higher video frame rates.
OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a superior memory for applications and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal memory capacity. OPPO Find X3 Pro has a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 50% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.