Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-30 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a global score of 80.4, which is slightly better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro's 79.9 overall score. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy Note Fan Edition is incredibly older than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, it's construction is a little bit thinner and lighter. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3216px, a bit higher pixels number per screen inch and a larger display. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a very superior camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution, higher 60 fps video frame rates and a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.