Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-30 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, with an 89 score against 79.9. Even though Galaxy Note10 is older than OPPO Find X3 Pro, it's design is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit better screen than Galaxy Note10, because it has a higher pixel count per screen inch, a better 1440 x 3216 pixels resolution and a bit bigger display.
The Galaxy Note10's memory capacity for applications and games is just as good as the OPPO Find X3 Pro one, both of them have equal 256 GB internal memory. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy Note10, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 29% greater battery size. OPPO Find X3 Pro captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor and a lot more megapixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.