Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-30 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is slightly better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, having a score of 86.2 against 79.9. Although it's the best device in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite's construction is older, a little thicker and a little bit heavier than the OPPO Find X3 Pro. Both devices we are comparing use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any difference regarding OS features.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit better display than Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have a display of the same size, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a greater pixels quantity per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3216 pixels. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a better memory for apps and games than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. OPPO Find X3 Pro takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a much higher 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
OPPO Find X3 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite feature really similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.