Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-30 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note5 is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, having an 80.2 score against 79.9. Galaxy Note5's design is lighter and just a little bit thinner than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 6 years before. OPPO Find X3 Pro has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a little more pixels per display inch, a larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3216 pixels. OPPO Find X3 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has faster 60 fps video frame rate, a larger camera aperture for better low light photography and videos, a much bigger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality pictures and videos and a lot more megapixels back-facing camera.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note5, because it has 192 GB more internal storage. The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 50% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.