Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-30 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X3 Pro is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note7, getting a overall score of 79.9 against 79.5. OPPO Find X3 Pro is a a lot newer device than Samsung Galaxy Note7, but it's a little bit thicker and heavier. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has 4 more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3216 pixels, a just a bit higher screen pixel density and a bigger display. OPPO Find X3 Pro takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with higher 60 frames per second video frame rate, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality photographs and a back camera with lot more MP.
OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. OPPO Find X3 Pro features improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.