Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-30 | 2017-09-15 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note8 is slightly better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, having an 83 score against 79.9. Samsung Galaxy Note8's body is extremely older, just a bit heavier and a little thicker than OPPO Find X3 Pro. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note8 has newer 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11, counting with some nice extra features and increased performance.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because it has a little greater pixel count per inch of display, a little bit larger display and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3216. OPPO Find X3 Pro has a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note8, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy Note8, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM. OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because it has a 36% more battery capacity. OPPO Find X3 Pro features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher resolution, better video frame rates and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking much better quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.