Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-30 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a general score of 88.3, which is better than OPPO Find X3 Pro's overall score of 79.9. Samsung Galaxy S10's body is just a little bit thinner and lighter than OPPO Find X3 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Both phones in our current comparison work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any differences in that aspect.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a little better performance than Galaxy S10, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a slightly better looking display than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little worse 1440 x 3040 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher display density.
The Galaxy S10 has a slightly better storage to store more games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. OPPO Find X3 Pro features improved battery life than Galaxy S10, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3400mAh.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a better camera than Galaxy S10, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a way larger sensor providing a much better image quality and a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.