Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-30 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Blue and Gloss Black | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3216 x 1440 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 526 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, with a overall score of 93.6 against 79.9. Despite of the fact the Galaxy S10 5G is older and just a little heavier than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, it's design is still just a bit thinner. These phones have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy S10 5G, and although they both have a display with the same size, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3216px and a little better screen pixels density.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy S10 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Find X3 Pro takes better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and pictures and a back camera with a much better resolution.
Galaxy S10 5G has as much storage capacity for apps and games as the OPPO Find X3 Pro one, they have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage. The Galaxy S10 5G's battery performance is just as good as the battery lifetime in OPPO Find X3 Pro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.